For photorum.eclat-mauve.fr Christmas I got a fascinating present from a buddy - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was completely written by AI, with a few simple triggers about me supplied by my pal Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and parentingliteracy.com is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty style of composing, however it's also a bit recurring, and really verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's triggers in looking at information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 customised books, generally in the US, given that pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who created it, can buy any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody developing one in anyone's name, consisting of celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book contains a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and developed "exclusively to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is intended as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get sold further.

He wants to widen his variety, creating various categories such as sci-fi, and possibly offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - offering AI-generated items to human customers.

It's also a bit frightening if, like me, you write for a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce similar content based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are discussing data here, we in fact suggest human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is pictures. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to nominate it for surgiteams.com a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe using generative AI for creative purposes must be prohibited, however I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without permission need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be really powerful but let's construct it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors using its work for fishtanklive.wiki their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have chosen to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have chosen to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to utilize creators' on the internet to help develop their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is likewise strongly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining among its finest carrying out markets on the vague promise of development."

A federal government representative said: "No move will be made until we are definitely confident we have a practical strategy that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to assist them accredit their material, access to high-quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI plan, a national data library including public data from a wide variety of sources will also be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the safety of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector needed to share information of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been repealed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is said to want the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a variety of suits against AI firms, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been gotten by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the web without their authorization, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of elements which can make up fair use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training data and whether it must be paying for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its innovation for a fraction of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and cadizpedia.wikanda.es threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for larger projects. It has lots of errors and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to read in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But provided how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm not sure how long I can remain positive that my significantly slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in global innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.